In my previous blog, I recounted a routine one on one staff meeting between Henry and his manager, Violet. In one part of that meeting, Violet updated Henry on the status of his tuition reimbursement request. The request had to be approved by the department head, Lillian, who had not liked Henry for personal reasons for several years. Lillian, true to form, asked Violet some questions that were designed to preclude Henry from using this benefit.
The conversation between Henry and Violet was unfortunate already, but was not finished, either in content or in being unfortunate.
For some time, there had been an opening under Violet, caused by the departure of one of the department’s employee’s. Violet had worked to upgrade the position into something more than it was, in hopes of getting more help for herself and Henry, who were carrying a significant burden. Violet, to her credit, was not interested in handing all the work to Henry, but was sharing it equally between the two of them.
During this conversation, Violet informed Henry that the position now had taken a different spin, and she explained what the position would now encompass. Henry’s paid greater attention, as the position Violet was describing sounded very much like a position he had pitched for himself approximately a year ago. Henry had pitched this because it would have expanded his responsibilities, giving him greater knowledge and allowing him to explore new areas of his profession. When he had come to Violet about this idea, she encouraged him to create a job description for it, which she would take to Lillian. Henry did and, after some modification, Violet took it to Lillian. The job description, and the revised position, were never to be heard from again.
Once Violet had finished, Henry asked two questions of her. First, would his position description change due to the other person having this type of description. Second, could he apply for this position.
Violet paused, looking for the right words. While she had always been forthright with Henry, she wanted to make sure it was said in the most professional and gentle of manners. When she did speak, she explained to Henry that Lillian had a certain view of Henry’s capabilities and where he should be in the organization. There was no changing her mind on this, even though Henry had proven many times over to be more than what his position described. Because of this, it would be futile of him to bid for this position, as Lillian would never approve him for it.
It was time for Henry to pause. When he spoke again, he thanked Violet for her honesty and feedback. On the exterior, they continued with their meeting. Inside, Henry knew he would miss Violet terribly, but he had to move on. He had no chance of advancing in the organization as long as Lillian had any say in his future.
We, as human beings, need change. Some of us welcome it more frequently than others, some crave it more often, but we all need some form of change in our lives. Whether it is a redecorating of our house or something new at work, we need it in order to keep fresh. Sound businesses understand this, but also see that, in keeping up fresh, it also benefits the organization. We learn new skills, new ideas, and new ways of viewing the word around us. In most businesses, managers look for their people to learn something new every year, as it makes the employees more valuable to the company.
So, when the employee comes to the manager wanting to change, wanting to progress, it should be considered a good thing. To want the employee to stay the same, do the same duties, because it fits the manager’s needs or because the manager has closed his or her mind to the possibilities of his or her employee, says a lot about the manager. This is a manager who is looking solely at his or her need, his or her mindset, and his or her prejudices. Too bad for the employee, I really don’t care about them, as long as I don’t have to change my mind or have any to consider anything new. When a leader, who should know better, begins to actively block someone from becoming more than they are, it is time for both the leader to have some serious reflection and for the company to begin to think about whether they need that leader.
Blood in the veins doesn’t help the body if it doesn’t move, change, and circulate. The same can be said about companies, and the departments within those companies. The lifeblood of the company, its employees, need to move, circulate, and change. To continue the medical analogy, if a blockage is discovered, it is removed. Shouldn’t it be the same for blockages in the company’s lifeblood?